Egypt's political crisis and those "monster" winter storms have NOTHING on the two most buzzed about topics in the world right now:
What designer will Kate Middleton wear down the aisle? And for gosh sakes - what tiara will she choose to light up Westminster Abbey?
Jezebel collected some of the buzz and here are the highlights:
The Royal Wedding Dress Designer:
Rumor has it that Princess Diana's longtime fashion collaborator, designer Bruce Oldfield, is the chosen one to create the most famous wedding dress of the 21st Century.
During an interview with ABC News today, he wouldn't reveal if he is "the one" - but he did make these startling predictions:
Kate will wear long sleeves
Kate will wear a veil
I'm going to sleep well tonight, Bruce. Thanks for the tip!
The Trouble with Tiaras:
Too many tiaras - too little time. While devoted royal watchers take pride in their vast knowledge of the tiaras The Queen could choose for Kate's big day (Yup, it's all up to grandma) - I haven't a clue. That's why I visit Mad Hattery's Tiara-Pedia to get up to speed - a delicious place to waste time on a Friday afternoon.
The smart money is on The Strathmore Rose tiara - which was a wedding gift to the Queen Mum from her father, the Earl of Strathmore.
Or blogger, Aestheticus Rex, puts the Fringe Tiara in the mix as well - which The Queen Mother lent to both her daughter Princess Elizabeth and granddaughter Princess Anne on their respective wedding days.
The questions! The questions! Too many questions! The dress? The tiara? Who is on the guest list? Who will be royally snubbed? Where will they honeymoon? Will Harry bring a date? Will Prince Charles bring a personality?
There's only twelve weeks left until April 29th when all will finally be revealed, jewelry hounds. Until then, you have my permission to ignore important world events, life threatening storms - and taxes.
Lindsay Lohan

Yes, jewelry hounds. Just when you thought our Li-Lo was turning the page to more legit uses of our favorite shiny stuff, she brings us back to her warped reality where 'stealing' is somehow really just 'borrowing' with benefits.
The latest nonsense has Lindsay 'borrowing' a one-of-a-kind $2500 gold necklace from El Ray jewelry store in Los Angeles. The store claims the piece went missing right after Lindsay was seen wearing it in a surveillance video. Lindsay claims her stylist "borrowed it" and just didn't return it in time.

Get it together, Lohan.
Valentine's Day 2.0
Valentine's Day is creeping up on us faster than a Charlie Sheen relapse, jewelry hounds, and the holiday of love has me thinking:
Why is it that only couples get to celebrate Valentine's Day? And more importantly? Why is it that only women who are in a RELATIONSHIP get the jewelry spoils from this bling-filled occasion?
Besties like Jennifer Aniston and Courteney Cox, for example, should get each other diamond heart pendants this year - or Eva Longoria should splurge on a diamond right hand ring to celebrate the fact that she no longer has to put up with basketball highlights and boring conversation!
![]() |
| 1/2ct Diamond Heart Pendant, $199.93 |
Mothers can give to daughters, daughters can give to mothers...
![]() |
| Mother & Child Diamond Pendant, $74.19 |
Or maybe your favorite teacher, bartender, or (in Charlie Sheen's case) lawyer deserves a little love this Valentine's Day?
![]() |
| 3/8 ct Diamond Flower Right Hand Ring $234.01 |
You get the idea, right? I'm just saying that the 'romantically involved' shouldn't have a monopoly on a holiday that celebrates meaningful relationships. And (more importantly) diamonds.
Thoughts?
P.S. JewelClub is having a Valentine's Day Sample Sale this week, and the merch is selling faster than (fill in the blank....) at a Charlie Sheen house party (click here for more).
Get while the gettin's good!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











